🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to employ a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

That lower court had determined that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to employ the maps established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling comes amid a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Typically, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic representatives criticized the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading Democratic figure said the court had another time damaged its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.