🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.