🔗 Share this article

In a first-of-its-kind legal move, San Francisco is initiating what is being called the nation's first government lawsuit targeting major food manufacturers over highly processed food products. The city contends that city and county authorities have been shouldering the significant costs of addressing illnesses linked to the widespread public consumption of these companies' products.

The Primary Allegation of the Case

The city's legal action, to be submitted in superior court, names ten industry giants responsible for manufacturing some of the America's favorite food and beverage items. This list reportedly encompasses everything from breaded chicken pieces and pre-made pizzas to crisps and sweetened morning cereals. Notably, the action also addresses products like certain breads and snack bars that are often marketed as "nutritious" options.

The lawsuit charges these companies of perpetrating "deceptive business practices" in their promotion and distribution. It argues that these actions contravene state laws concerning deceptive trade and community harm. A key allegation is that the corporations knew their products were linked to illness but opted for profit over safety.

"It is deeply troubling that countless consumers are being misled and buying food that's not food," remarked the city's top legal official.

Examining UPFs

UPFs are manufactured using industrial processes and contain additives not typically found in a family pantry. These encompass preservatives, flavor enhancers, synthetic dyes, and emulsifiers, with virtually zero unprocessed food content.

Research estimates that more than 70% of the food available in the U.S. is comprised of foods commonly considered ultra-processed. Alarmingly, young people are estimated to get over 60% of their energy from UPFs.

The Documented Dangers

A extensive global scientific review, published recently, found that intake of these products is connected to harm in all vital bodily systems of the body. The study tied these foods with an elevated risk of a numerous chronic diseases, encompassing:

• Oncological diseases
• Obesity
• Type 2 diabetes
• Mental health struggles
• Heart disease
• Cognitive decline

The researchers of that study concluded that the rise of UPFs is being propelled by large food conglomerates, not personal consumer decisions. They described UPFs as a major contributor of a global "chronic disease pandemic" linked to diet, with food companies focusing on earnings over public health.

Political Agreement on a Uncommon Subject

This case marks a rare moment of concurrence between the liberal city of San Francisco and the current federal administration. The federal Health and Human Services Secretary has publicly criticized ultra-processed foods, encouraging Americans to limit their consumption on products with excess sugar, salt, unhealthy fats, dyes, and chemical preservatives as part of a "public health initiative" mission.

The city attorney noted that while he parts ways with the administration on many other health topics, the science on ultra-processed foods is "indisputable." He commented, "Many the perspectives of this administration are unscientific, but this is an exception. Even a broken clock is right twice a day."

Implicated Defendants and Legal Precedent

The corporations listed in the legal filing apparently include household names such as:

• The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo
• Kraft Heinz Company
• General Mills and Kellogg
• Nestlé USA and Mondelez International
• Post Holdings, Mars Incorporated, and ConAgra Brands

This lawsuit follows other regulatory steps in California. Earlier this year, the state approved a law that became the first in the U.S. to legally define of ultra-processed foods, laying a foundation for potentially banning them from schools. The state has also banned certain chemicals, including food dyes linked to behavioral difficulties in children, within school meals.

The city attorney's office has a track record in winning cases against big business on public health matters, including cases against cigarette manufacturers, paint companies, and pharmaceutical firms.

The lawsuit will seek monetary restitution for the expenses that local governments incur for caring for citizens whose wellness has been compromised by the dietary reliance of ultra-processed food.